A Recursive Meta-Dynamic Principle

A Recursive Meta-Dynamic Principle for Universal Development and Fractal Organization

Hannes Windrath
January 21, 2026

Abstract

We formulate a substrate-independent meta-principle that describes universal development across multiple scales. The system is modeled as a recursive, dissipative, and interacting dynamic system. In simulations, fractal organization emerges as a stable attractor with a dimension of $D_f \approx 1.5$ in 2D and $D_f \approx 2.5$ in 3D systems. This value represents the energetic optimum for material and information exchange in complex networks. Our results suggest that the meta-equation constitutes a universal organizational grammar explaining structural similarity among biological, physical, and cosmological systems.

1 Introduction

Fractal patterns appear ubiquitously in nature, technology, biology, and social systems. Existing theories typically explain such patterns only locally. Here, we propose a meta-principle that combines recursive state updates, dissipation, and interaction across all scales. Our goal is a universal organizational principle that generates fractal structures as stable attractors.

2 The Meta-Equation

The central meta-development equation describes the temporal evolution of a system state through the interplay of internal dynamics and cross-scale feedback:

$$ U^{(i)}_{t+1} = U^{(i)}_t + \left(F^{(i)}_{+} - F^{(i)}_{-}\right) + C^{(i)} + R\!\left(U^{(i)}_t\right) + D\!\left(U^{(i)}_t\right) + I\!\left(U^{(i)}, U^{(j)}\right) \tag{1} $$

3 Numerical Implementation & 3D Extension

3.1 2D Base Model

For numerical analysis, we utilize a discrete update rule that captures the essential non-linear dynamics:

$$ U^{(i)}_{t+1} = U^{(i)}_t + a U^{(i)}_t + b \left(U^{(i)}_t\right)^2 - c \left(U^{(i)}_t\right)^3 + \varepsilon \left(U^{(i-1)} - U^{(i)}_t\right) + \eta^{(i)}_t \tag{2} $$

In this model, the interaction parameter $\varepsilon$ and the cubic non-linearity induce robust self-similarity.

3.2 Extension to 3D Space (Tensor-Field Formulation)

To represent physical reality, the model is transformed into a field-theoretic formulation over space $\vec{r} = (x, y, z)$:

$$ \frac{\partial U^{(i)}(\vec{r}, t)}{\partial t} = R\!\left(U^{(i)}\right) + D\!\left(U^{(i)}\right) + \kappa \nabla^2 U^{(i)} + I\!\left(U^{(i)}, U^{(j)}\right) + \eta^{(i)}(\vec{r}, t) \tag{3} $$

The Laplace operator $\nabla^2$ enables spatial morphogenesis. In 3D, the attractor shifts to $D_f \approx 2.5$, corresponding to maximal surface efficiency at minimal volume, representing an optimal dissipative structure.

4 Discussion: Recursion as Generative Grammar

Fractal structures do not emerge randomly but as a necessary physical consequence of the meta-equation. $D_f \approx 1.5$ (2D) and $D_f \approx 2.5$ (3D) represent states of maximal synergy. The system stabilizes its own dynamics through self-reference, suggesting that recursion acts as a generative grammar for complexity in open systems.

5 References & Theoretical Foundations

5.1 Systems Theory and Self-Organization

  • Synergetics (Haken)
  • Dissipative Structures (Prigogine)
  • Free Energy Principle (Friston)
  • Maximum Entropy Production (Kleidon)

5.2 Complexity, Recursion, and Evolution

  • Assembly Theory (Cronin/Walker)
  • The Hypercycle (Eigen/Schuster)
  • Viable System Model (Beer)
  • Second-Order Cybernetics (von Foerster)

5.3 Fractal Physics and Scale Invariance

  • Scale Relativity (Nottale)
  • Constructal Law (Bejan)
  • Lambda-e Hypothesis (Voineag)

5.4 Informational and Quantum Interpretations

  • Integrated Information Theory (Tononi)
  • Constructor Theory (Deutsch/Marletto)
  • Implicate Order (Bohm)

5.5 Philosophical and Epistemic Integration

  • Laws of Form (Spencer-Brown)
  • Strange Loops (Hofstadter)
  • Catastrophe Theory (Thom)

6 Conclusion

The Principle shows that universal developmental systems generate fractal patterns as stable attractors. The meta-equation provides a quantitative framework for describing self-referential evolution across all physical scales. By removing local substrate dependencies, we gain a clear view of the morphogenetic forces that shape our universe.